SecQube expands to the US and why visibility still matters

SecQube expands to the United States

With growing demand from US based organisations, SecQube has established an active presence in the United States, operating through SecQube Inc, registered in Delaware, with operations based in Las Vegas.

This demand has been driven by organisations facing familiar pressures at scale: rising signal volume, complex and shared environments, increasing regulatory scrutiny, and growing concern over where security data is processed and held.

US organisations are choosing SecQube because it takes a fundamentally different approach. By connecting directly to the Microsoft Graph, SecQube interprets security signals at source, preserving full context across identities, activity, and environments. There is no duplication or relocation of data, and no secondary vendor platform taking custody of sensitive security information.

Security data remains within the customer’s own cloud environment, region locked, and under their control. This reduces third-party exposure, supports clearer accountability, and removes unnecessary operational risk.

As SecQube supports customers across the UK, Europe, and now the United States, the approach remains consistent: clarity over noise, visibility without compromise, and confidence at scale.

When shared systems fail, visibility matters most

One of the most consistent patterns in recent cyber incidents isn’t how attackers get in.

It’s how long it takes organisations to realise what’s happening once they’re already inside.

Security teams are surrounded by signals.
Logs. Alerts. Anomalies. Indicators.

But signal volume alone doesn’t create clarity.

What matters is how quickly those signals are interpreted, prioritised, and acted on. That gap between detection and understanding is where most damage occurs.

The incident

Recent cyber incidents affecting public sector organisations have highlighted a recurring challenge: shared infrastructure.

In several cases, multiple organisations were impacted at the same time due to shared services, platforms, or identity environments.

Public reporting often focuses on when systems were shut down and services disrupted.

What’s far less clear is:

• how long attackers were present before detection
• whether suspicious activity was visible but not understood
• how quickly teams could see the full scope of impact across shared environments

These unanswered questions matter more than the breach headline itself.

What this reveals

Shared infrastructure brings efficiency, but it also introduces complexity.

When visibility is fragmented across organisations or environments:

• alerts become harder to correlate
• ownership becomes unclear
• triage slows under pressure

In these situations, response time isn’t limited by technology alone.

It’s limited by how quickly humans can interpret what they’re seeing.

Security teams don’t fail because they lack data.
They struggle because making sense of that data takes time they don’t have.

The faster teams can move from signal to understanding, the more control they retain.

What organisations should review

Incidents like these are a useful moment to pause and ask a few practical questions:

• How long does it typically take us to understand whether an alert really matters?
• Do we have clear visibility across shared services and environments?
• Is triage largely manual, or supported by automation?
• Can leadership see what’s happening clearly without technical translation?
• Do we know exactly where our security data is processed and stored?

These questions aren’t about blame.

They’re about readiness.

A final thought

Cybersecurity resilience isn’t just about stopping attacks.

It’s about whether teams can see clearly, early enough, to act with confidence.

Many platforms attempt to solve this by pulling data into separate systems and processing layers. That often introduces delay, complexity, and new risk, especially in shared or regulated environments.

SecQube takes a different approach. Signals are interpreted where they already live, inside the organisation’s own cloud environment, preserving context and ownership from the outset.

When interpretation happens closer to the source, dwell time falls.
When signals stay in place, visibility improves.
And when security data remains region locked and sovereign, confidence extends beyond the incident itself.

Clarity doesn’t come from collecting more signals.
It comes from understanding the ones you already have.

‍

‍